I am seeking advice on a situation where a company has delayed the payment of salaries or conveyance for a month. The staff members fall into two categories: the first group earns significantly higher wages, while the second group earns between 15k to 25k. When salaries are delayed, those earning above 30k can manage, but those earning below 30k face financial difficulties. Consequently, the latter group often approaches the HR department, asking for an advance of about 5k against their salary or conveyance to manage their finances.
However, when the HR department presents this request to the management, they often respond by stating that many companies delay salaries or conveyance payments for up to 3-4 months, and since they have only delayed it for one month, they question why the staff is raising this request.
I am questioning whether this is a good practice. As per my understanding, we work because we need to manage our financial responsibilities. If the only source of income is delayed and an employee encounters an emergency, the company should consider that they are obligated to pay these funds and that the employees are merely asking for their own money.
However, when the HR department presents this request to the management, they often respond by stating that many companies delay salaries or conveyance payments for up to 3-4 months, and since they have only delayed it for one month, they question why the staff is raising this request.
I am questioning whether this is a good practice. As per my understanding, we work because we need to manage our financial responsibilities. If the only source of income is delayed and an employee encounters an emergency, the company should consider that they are obligated to pay these funds and that the employees are merely asking for their own money.