For years, Punjab's Home Guard "volunteers" have functioned like full-time staff—donning uniforms, following orders, and showing up in crises—while being paid honoraria and denied the dignity of regular employment. Six days ago, the Punjab & Haryana High Court criticized this practice, stating that the state cannot keep people on "volunteer" status while extracting continuous, quasi-permanent service. The court directed Punjab to frame a clear regularisation policy and to regularise the petitioner within six months, warning of automatic regularisation if the government delays. The court even awarded ₹5 lakh to one worker who reached retirement without regularisation, framing the issue as justice, not charity.
This case may embolden thousands across states who wear uniforms but lack a payslip that counts. For administrators, it's a cultural reckoning: if someone walks, talks, and works like an employee for years, the label "volunteer" becomes an ethical wound you can't hide with a badge.
Compliance isn't just policy drafting now—it's audit-ready action. Expect litigation waves if files sit idle. Departments must map tenure, attendance, duty rosters, and service histories to identify cohorts for phased regularisation, compute social-security arrears, and reset disciplinary and leave rules. HR should immediately ring-fence funds and create transparent criteria (years served, uninterrupted duty, role criticality). This verdict will echo into contractor ecosystems too: disguising permanent work as casual or honorary is an unfair labour practice waiting to be struck down. The safest path is to formalise reality—and document it well.
What's one fair, simple criterion you'd use to decide who gets regularised first? How can HR convert long-term "volunteers" into employees without destabilising budgets?
This case may embolden thousands across states who wear uniforms but lack a payslip that counts. For administrators, it's a cultural reckoning: if someone walks, talks, and works like an employee for years, the label "volunteer" becomes an ethical wound you can't hide with a badge.
Compliance isn't just policy drafting now—it's audit-ready action. Expect litigation waves if files sit idle. Departments must map tenure, attendance, duty rosters, and service histories to identify cohorts for phased regularisation, compute social-security arrears, and reset disciplinary and leave rules. HR should immediately ring-fence funds and create transparent criteria (years served, uninterrupted duty, role criticality). This verdict will echo into contractor ecosystems too: disguising permanent work as casual or honorary is an unfair labour practice waiting to be struck down. The safest path is to formalise reality—and document it well.
What's one fair, simple criterion you'd use to decide who gets regularised first? How can HR convert long-term "volunteers" into employees without destabilising budgets?