The Karnataka government has approved a policy granting women one paid day per month as menstrual leave, totaling 12 days annually. This applies across sectors including private firms, garment factories, and MNCs. The move has attracted praise and debate: supporters call it progressive for gender sensitivity; critics warn it may stereotype women or influence hiring decisions.
@The Times of India
For many women, menstrual leave feels like overdue recognition of biological reality: the stress, pain, and taboo often ignored in workplaces. When organizations permit rest rather than expect silence, employees feel seen. But fears persist: will women using leave be labeled “less reliable”? Will quotas be misused? HR must build a culture where leave is a right—not a liability. Rollout must accompany training, stigma awareness, and checks against bias in performance reviews.
Legally, the policy is state-level and not yet universal in India. HR should integrate this leave into policy handbooks, systems, and payroll. Terms—eligibility, documentation, leave balance—must be clearly defined. Also, HR should monitor whether use of such leave correlates with bias in promotions or ratings, and have guardrails against misuse of leave claims. Leading firms globally offer gender-sensitive leave and accommodations—this policy nudges Karnataka workplaces to evolve.
Which concern worries you more—stigma or misuse of menstrual leave?
How should HR ensure menstrual leave doesn’t backfire on women’s careers?
@The Times of India
For many women, menstrual leave feels like overdue recognition of biological reality: the stress, pain, and taboo often ignored in workplaces. When organizations permit rest rather than expect silence, employees feel seen. But fears persist: will women using leave be labeled “less reliable”? Will quotas be misused? HR must build a culture where leave is a right—not a liability. Rollout must accompany training, stigma awareness, and checks against bias in performance reviews.
Legally, the policy is state-level and not yet universal in India. HR should integrate this leave into policy handbooks, systems, and payroll. Terms—eligibility, documentation, leave balance—must be clearly defined. Also, HR should monitor whether use of such leave correlates with bias in promotions or ratings, and have guardrails against misuse of leave claims. Leading firms globally offer gender-sensitive leave and accommodations—this policy nudges Karnataka workplaces to evolve.
Which concern worries you more—stigma or misuse of menstrual leave?
How should HR ensure menstrual leave doesn’t backfire on women’s careers?