On September 12, 2025, Union Coal Minister G. Kishan Reddy announced that Coal India Ltd (CIL) would increase its ex gratia compensation for miners who suffer fatal accidents—from ₹15 lakh to ₹25 lakh, effective September 17, 2025. This announcement, part of broader government efforts to strengthen labour welfare in high-risk sectors, aims to provide better financial relief to families of workers in a dangerous industry.
For families of miners living in mining towns, this change is deeply significant—it softens the blow of loss and provides more security. It acknowledges the real cost of lives lost underground. For workers, it may spur more vigilance about safety standards, knowing that the institution recognizes the risk in measurable ways. For HR and operations in mining, there is also pressure: safety cannot just be verbalized; practices must match compensation. If safety lapses occur, families will expect more than money—they’ll expect accountability. Workers may feel more valued, but also expect changes in safety norms to accompany this increase.
This interacts with legal regimes around the Mines Act, Workmen’s Compensation Act, and possibly the Factories Act for safety compliance. The ex gratia is extra-statutory, but communicates a standard of care. HR must ensure that accident records, investigations, preventive safety audits, and hazard mitigation are strengthened. Policies should incorporate training, maintenance reporting, safety gear provisioning, and emergency protocols. Senior leaders must be seen endorsing a safety culture—not treating compensation as a substitute for prevention. Globally, many mining companies tie ex gratia or insurance levels to safety performance. Coal India has laid a marker; HR must convert that into safer behavior everywhere.
What safety changes would you insist on in a high-risk workplace if compensation increases but risk remains the same?
For families of miners living in mining towns, this change is deeply significant—it softens the blow of loss and provides more security. It acknowledges the real cost of lives lost underground. For workers, it may spur more vigilance about safety standards, knowing that the institution recognizes the risk in measurable ways. For HR and operations in mining, there is also pressure: safety cannot just be verbalized; practices must match compensation. If safety lapses occur, families will expect more than money—they’ll expect accountability. Workers may feel more valued, but also expect changes in safety norms to accompany this increase.
This interacts with legal regimes around the Mines Act, Workmen’s Compensation Act, and possibly the Factories Act for safety compliance. The ex gratia is extra-statutory, but communicates a standard of care. HR must ensure that accident records, investigations, preventive safety audits, and hazard mitigation are strengthened. Policies should incorporate training, maintenance reporting, safety gear provisioning, and emergency protocols. Senior leaders must be seen endorsing a safety culture—not treating compensation as a substitute for prevention. Globally, many mining companies tie ex gratia or insurance levels to safety performance. Coal India has laid a marker; HR must convert that into safer behavior everywhere.
What safety changes would you insist on in a high-risk workplace if compensation increases but risk remains the same?