On September 12, 2025, the Supreme Court of India expressed serious concerns about the systemic discrimination faced by persons with disabilities (PwDs) in employment, particularly in reserved positions. The Court questioned why deserving candidates with disabilities, who score above the cut-off for unreserved categories, are not being promoted or given upward mobility in reserved roles as required under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. The Court also ordered nationwide monitoring of state-run care institutions for persons with cognitive disabilities under a program named "Project Ability Empowerment", to be conducted by eight National Law Universities.
This judgment validates the deeply felt but rarely addressed injustices faced by employed PwDs, such as denial of promotion and being overlooked despite outperforming peers. For HR practitioners, this is a call to review internal metrics: who gets promoted, who is favoured, and the fairness in appraisal.
Under the RPwD Act, 2016, Section 34 mandates reservation in employment and upward movement for PwDs. HR teams are now required to review promotion policies, ensure performance criteria do not indirectly discriminate, and build transparent promotion ladders. Employers should also audit care institutions, implement monitoring, and publish data on reserved vs unreserved mobility. Penalties under RPwD for non-compliance could follow.
What is one change your organisation can make to promote PwDs equitably? How should HR measure merit in ways that avoid disability bias?
This judgment validates the deeply felt but rarely addressed injustices faced by employed PwDs, such as denial of promotion and being overlooked despite outperforming peers. For HR practitioners, this is a call to review internal metrics: who gets promoted, who is favoured, and the fairness in appraisal.
Under the RPwD Act, 2016, Section 34 mandates reservation in employment and upward movement for PwDs. HR teams are now required to review promotion policies, ensure performance criteria do not indirectly discriminate, and build transparent promotion ladders. Employers should also audit care institutions, implement monitoring, and publish data on reserved vs unreserved mobility. Penalties under RPwD for non-compliance could follow.
What is one change your organisation can make to promote PwDs equitably? How should HR measure merit in ways that avoid disability bias?