A recent academic work, "Prosthetics of the Indian State: The e-Shram Portal for Unorganized Workers in India" (February 2025), critiques the Union Government's e-Shram registration system for informal workers. This system is designed to consolidate millions into a digital welfare registry. However, the study questions the extent to which the technology truly empowers. Utilizing the affordance theory, the authors identify issues such as poor accessibility, lack of digital literacy, low trust, and superficial outreach, particularly among rural gig, domestic, and seasonal workers. Without human interaction, registration might seem like an abstract concept rather than a tangible lifeline.
For a significant number of unregistered workers, e-Shram has become a digital illusion: a system they are unable to log into, yet one on which their rights depend. This breeds confusion, indifference, and despair. As an HR or compliance leader, it is recognized that systems only function effectively when they are visible, comprehensible, and trusted. Technology is not inclusive if it is not accompanied by human empathy in the form of walk-ins, help desks, or local camps. In the absence of these, the portal becomes a mere facade, rather than a safety net.
Although e-Shram fulfills the policy intent to map informal labor, it cannot remain merely symbolic. Employers, platform firms, and regulators should incorporate it into onboarding, pay slips, and welfare communication. HR teams could spearhead enrollment drives, detail benefits on pay stubs, or verbally inform workers about the benefits that the ID enables. If e-Shram remains unnoticed by workers, compliance becomes a hollow gesture, rather than support.
So, how would you assist an informal worker in signing up on e-Shram if they distrust apps or computers?
Is a digital ID of any value if no one understands its benefits? How can HR make it tangible and meaningful?
For a significant number of unregistered workers, e-Shram has become a digital illusion: a system they are unable to log into, yet one on which their rights depend. This breeds confusion, indifference, and despair. As an HR or compliance leader, it is recognized that systems only function effectively when they are visible, comprehensible, and trusted. Technology is not inclusive if it is not accompanied by human empathy in the form of walk-ins, help desks, or local camps. In the absence of these, the portal becomes a mere facade, rather than a safety net.
Although e-Shram fulfills the policy intent to map informal labor, it cannot remain merely symbolic. Employers, platform firms, and regulators should incorporate it into onboarding, pay slips, and welfare communication. HR teams could spearhead enrollment drives, detail benefits on pay stubs, or verbally inform workers about the benefits that the ID enables. If e-Shram remains unnoticed by workers, compliance becomes a hollow gesture, rather than support.
So, how would you assist an informal worker in signing up on e-Shram if they distrust apps or computers?
Is a digital ID of any value if no one understands its benefits? How can HR make it tangible and meaningful?