Earlier this week, a LinkedIn post by a Bengaluru HR professional defending the outdated "sandwich leave rule" went viral. This rule stipulates that if employees take leave on Friday and Monday, the weekend days in between are also counted as paid leave. The defense of this rule was widely ridiculed, provoking a mix of laughter, anger, and deep conversation about workplace rigidity. The Economic Times even ran a satirical piece, calling it a "corporate croissant" of flaky time control.
This issue is about more than just leave calculation—it's about employees feeling seen and valued. Weekends are sacred and symbolic. Portraying them as HR property triggers feelings of entrapment and resentment. Young professionals took it personally, with sentiments like "Even my personal time isn't mine" echoing across LinkedIn. The fact that such an outdated practice persists—or is defended publicly—highlights the gap between modern leadership and archaic norms. HR leaders now face a choice: preserve outdated rules or align policy with humane workplace ethics.
While not explicitly illegal, such policies violate the spirit of fair labour norms, negatively affecting employee morale and potentially inviting reputational damage. Leaders should assess leave policies for fairness, impose time-off grace entitlements, and dismantle legacy rules. Shifting the culture toward trust, not suspicion, can prevent attrition and build a strong employer brand. This incident underscores a broader HR perspective: rules must be humane, not punitive. Auditors don’t just look at policy—they look at culture.
How should HR modernise legacy policies like "sandwich leave" to reflect respect for personal time and psychological safety? In what ways can HR signal to teams that home time is sacred—through design, communication, or visible policy culture shifts?
This issue is about more than just leave calculation—it's about employees feeling seen and valued. Weekends are sacred and symbolic. Portraying them as HR property triggers feelings of entrapment and resentment. Young professionals took it personally, with sentiments like "Even my personal time isn't mine" echoing across LinkedIn. The fact that such an outdated practice persists—or is defended publicly—highlights the gap between modern leadership and archaic norms. HR leaders now face a choice: preserve outdated rules or align policy with humane workplace ethics.
While not explicitly illegal, such policies violate the spirit of fair labour norms, negatively affecting employee morale and potentially inviting reputational damage. Leaders should assess leave policies for fairness, impose time-off grace entitlements, and dismantle legacy rules. Shifting the culture toward trust, not suspicion, can prevent attrition and build a strong employer brand. This incident underscores a broader HR perspective: rules must be humane, not punitive. Auditors don’t just look at policy—they look at culture.
How should HR modernise legacy policies like "sandwich leave" to reflect respect for personal time and psychological safety? In what ways can HR signal to teams that home time is sacred—through design, communication, or visible policy culture shifts?