Genpact recently faced an employee revolt after it implemented policies extending workdays from 8 to 10 hours, citing compliance with draft regulations. It appears that market-driven efficiency has overtaken employee morale, as morale plummeted and voices of dissent emerged publicly. The line between mandatory and voluntary compliance became blurred. This situation highlights a crucial HR dilemma: legal compliance might require alignment, but what if "following the rule" conflicts with culture and retention? Should HR halt policy changes when there's strong employee backlash, even if the changes are legally compliant? How can HR develop change management strategies that balance compliance with emotional buy-in?