A former employee at a startup in Bengaluru accused the CEO of daily psychological abuse, including micromanagement and emotional manipulation. He also alleged HR harassment even after his resignation. He described enduring constant mental torture during his tenure, and claimed that HR gaslighted him when he tried to leave. This incident exposes a leadership fault line in startup ecosystems where accountability post-employment seems nonexistent. The situation sparked an intense online debate around power dynamics in startups. Is HR there to protect employee dignity, or simply to enforce corporate control, even after someone leaves? It highlights the critical need for external grievance channels and exit audits in young companies. How should HR frame exit processes to prevent post-resignation reprisals and protect employee mental well-being? What structures can support accountability in startups where the CEO is also the HR gatekeeper?