Dear Friends,
Striking Balance!
Judicial pronouncements in 2024 regarding employment laws and employer-employee relations have largely emphasized the right of regularization of contractual workers, working conditions, and social security. This includes entitlements such as gratuity, maternity benefits, and ensuring a safe work environment for women to prevent sexual harassment. These observations are expected to have a significant impact on the regulation of employment in the business world.
The Supreme Court has upheld the rights of temporary employees performing permanent duties in the case of Vinod Kumar vs. Union of India. In this case, employees who had been serving as accounts clerks under a temporary scheme for 25 years were granted regularization rights. The court emphasized that employment rights should be based on the actual duties and responsibilities performed over time rather than the initial temporary terms of appointment.
In another case, Divgi Metal Wares Ltd. vs. Divgi Metal Wares Employees Association, the court affirmed the importance of following transfer conditions outlined in standing orders when relocating employees from one state to another. Additionally, in the case of Shriram Manohar Bande vs. Uktranti Mandal, the court ruled that acceptance of an employee's resignation by the appropriate authority effectively terminates employment, even without direct communication to the employee.
Leave Encashment and Wage Revision
Regarding leave encashment, the Supreme Court stressed the employee's right to cash in accumulated leaves once allowed to accumulate them. In addressing wage revision, the court highlighted in The VVF Ltd. Employees Union vs. M/s. VVF India Ltd. that the 'industry-cum-region test' is a critical standard for determining wage revisions. This test involves comparing wages with similar units in the region while considering the employer's financial capacity.
Judgment on 'No Work, No Pay' Principle
A significant judgment by the Delhi High Court in the case of Manisha Sharma vs. Vidya Bhawan Girls Senior Secondary School established that the 'no work, no pay' principle does not apply when a termination is deemed illegal. This decision underscores the importance of fair compensation for employees in wrongful termination cases and discourages the indiscriminate application of the 'no work, no pay' principle without evidence of gainful employment during the adjudication period.
These examples illustrate the Indian judiciary's efforts to maintain a balance between the rights and responsibilities of both employers and employees through their judgments.
This annual edition of the compendium of important labor judgments of 2024 features around 800 judgments from the Supreme Court and various High Courts, selected by our research team from a vast pool of published judgments. We believe this edition will be highly valuable to our readers eagerly awaiting its release.
We welcome your feedback – whether positive or constructive.
Happy Reading!
Regards,
Anil Kaushik, Business Manager - HR Magazine
B-138, Ambedkar Nagar, Alwar - 301001 (Raj.)
Mobile No. [Phone Number Removed For Privacy-Reasons]
http://www.businessmanager.in
Striking Balance!
Judicial pronouncements in 2024 regarding employment laws and employer-employee relations have largely emphasized the right of regularization of contractual workers, working conditions, and social security. This includes entitlements such as gratuity, maternity benefits, and ensuring a safe work environment for women to prevent sexual harassment. These observations are expected to have a significant impact on the regulation of employment in the business world.
The Supreme Court has upheld the rights of temporary employees performing permanent duties in the case of Vinod Kumar vs. Union of India. In this case, employees who had been serving as accounts clerks under a temporary scheme for 25 years were granted regularization rights. The court emphasized that employment rights should be based on the actual duties and responsibilities performed over time rather than the initial temporary terms of appointment.
In another case, Divgi Metal Wares Ltd. vs. Divgi Metal Wares Employees Association, the court affirmed the importance of following transfer conditions outlined in standing orders when relocating employees from one state to another. Additionally, in the case of Shriram Manohar Bande vs. Uktranti Mandal, the court ruled that acceptance of an employee's resignation by the appropriate authority effectively terminates employment, even without direct communication to the employee.
Leave Encashment and Wage Revision
Regarding leave encashment, the Supreme Court stressed the employee's right to cash in accumulated leaves once allowed to accumulate them. In addressing wage revision, the court highlighted in The VVF Ltd. Employees Union vs. M/s. VVF India Ltd. that the 'industry-cum-region test' is a critical standard for determining wage revisions. This test involves comparing wages with similar units in the region while considering the employer's financial capacity.
Judgment on 'No Work, No Pay' Principle
A significant judgment by the Delhi High Court in the case of Manisha Sharma vs. Vidya Bhawan Girls Senior Secondary School established that the 'no work, no pay' principle does not apply when a termination is deemed illegal. This decision underscores the importance of fair compensation for employees in wrongful termination cases and discourages the indiscriminate application of the 'no work, no pay' principle without evidence of gainful employment during the adjudication period.
These examples illustrate the Indian judiciary's efforts to maintain a balance between the rights and responsibilities of both employers and employees through their judgments.
This annual edition of the compendium of important labor judgments of 2024 features around 800 judgments from the Supreme Court and various High Courts, selected by our research team from a vast pool of published judgments. We believe this edition will be highly valuable to our readers eagerly awaiting its release.
We welcome your feedback – whether positive or constructive.
Happy Reading!
Regards,
Anil Kaushik, Business Manager - HR Magazine
B-138, Ambedkar Nagar, Alwar - 301001 (Raj.)
Mobile No. [Phone Number Removed For Privacy-Reasons]
http://www.businessmanager.in
2 Attachment(s) [Login To View]