Sirs, One person undergoing punishment of "Reduction of pay to the minimum of basic pay for a period of 2 years without cumulative effect." Now, before the end of three months of the punishment, the organization implemented a special VRS scheme to reduce manpower, for which this employee also applied. The organization granted the Special VRS scheme three months prior to this punishment period, duly recovered the emoluments amount of the balance punishment period for those 3 months. In the office order, they stated that there are no punishments pending.
However, when calculating the pension, his pay was not restored. They calculated the pension with the punished (lower pay) rate, resulting in a significant variation in pension benefits. This employee faced two types of punishments: lower pay and the recovery of the amount for the balance punishment period. Since the punishment was a temporary measure, and the amount towards the balance punishment was recovered, why wasn't the original pay restored as they claimed there were no pending punishments? Who is correct in this situation? Are there any orders or judgments available to support the restoration of pay? If so, could you please provide a link?
Thank you all.
However, when calculating the pension, his pay was not restored. They calculated the pension with the punished (lower pay) rate, resulting in a significant variation in pension benefits. This employee faced two types of punishments: lower pay and the recovery of the amount for the balance punishment period. Since the punishment was a temporary measure, and the amount towards the balance punishment was recovered, why wasn't the original pay restored as they claimed there were no pending punishments? Who is correct in this situation? Are there any orders or judgments available to support the restoration of pay? If so, could you please provide a link?
Thank you all.