Contract Labour Act and Industrial Disputes Act: Choosing the Right Approach
Section 30(2) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, allows an agreement to be made with the Principal Employer or the Contractor. In this case, the contract labor union has submitted a charter of demands to the Principal Employer seeking a wage increase, which has not yet been discussed. To maintain industrial peace, the contractor is prepared to settle with the workers, and the Principal Employer has agreed to revise the work order terms to cover the financial impact of the settlement.
Which Approach is More Beneficial?
My question is: Which approach is more beneficial—to formalize this agreement under Section 30(2) of the CLRA or a settlement under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act? What are the key differences between these options?
Regards,
Section 30(2) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, allows an agreement to be made with the Principal Employer or the Contractor. In this case, the contract labor union has submitted a charter of demands to the Principal Employer seeking a wage increase, which has not yet been discussed. To maintain industrial peace, the contractor is prepared to settle with the workers, and the Principal Employer has agreed to revise the work order terms to cover the financial impact of the settlement.
Which Approach is More Beneficial?
My question is: Which approach is more beneficial—to formalize this agreement under Section 30(2) of the CLRA or a settlement under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act? What are the key differences between these options?
Regards,