Dear friend,
There may be a 'clause' in your appointment order issued to the terminated employee stating that employment can be terminated without notice. However, there is a fundamental right for an employee that requires a certain procedure to be followed before such an action. Even an underperforming employee who is on probation (with no mention of the probation duration or how many months he served) should be issued an advisory and given an opportunity to improve his performance over a specific period, say a month or two. Was any formal training or hands-on experience required? There is still an option to extend his probation period beyond the originally stipulated timeframe. Without following these precautionary measures, abruptly terminating him is not fair. The concerned party may not even know why he is being terminated if he is kept in the dark. He might believe he has performed well within his knowledge and experience. What if you demanded or expected more than what he was recruited for? It's possible. I feel a properly structured administration should adhere to certain measures and 'fair labor practices' before resorting to such actions. Generally, compensation is computed at 15 days of salary for every year of service rendered. If he has not completed one year, it becomes difficult. However, if he has completed one year, even under probation, he deserves 15 days' salary and a formal notice. Some establishments follow a 'no harm' attitude by simply asking him to resign, allowing him to be relieved without a 'remark'. These are my thoughts if he is not being terminated due to 'misconduct', if any. That would be a different situation.