When we started the company in 2020, we had branches in Chennai and Hyderabad. Hence, candidates were hired from Chennai and Hyderabad respectively. Hyderabad was the main development center. Due to the pandemic, employees were given the WFH option from 2020 to 2022.
During this period, we closed down our Chennai office and continued operations at the Hyderabad center. In 2023, we decided to ask Hyderabad employees to come to the office, while Chennai employees continued to work from home.
Leave Policy Concerns
My question pertains to our leave policy. Currently, there is not much work, but Hyderabad employees are required to come to the office with no WFH option. If they take time off, it gets noticed, and their leaves are consumed in our HRMS when they apply for leave. On the other hand, Chennai employees rarely apply for leave and always appear available when called upon. It's challenging to determine if they are at home or elsewhere since there isn't much work, and they have access to emails and Microsoft Teams on their mobile devices.
Current Leave Structure
We offer 12 Paid Leaves, 6 Casual Leaves, and 6 Sick Leaves per year (with monthly credits of 1 PL, 0.5 CL, and 0.5 SL). Paid Leaves accumulate, with a maximum of 30 leaves carried forward to the next year and can be encashed upon leaving the organization. Chennai employees have accumulated 30+ leaves over the years, while Hyderabad employees seem to be utilizing their leaves.
Questions Regarding Fairness and Policy Changes
My questions are:
a) Are we being unfair to Hyderabad employees?
b) If we change the policy for the next year to state that only 15 leaves can be carried forward, and the rest must be used by December or will lapse, is this entirely unfair to Chennai employees who have accumulated these leaves?
c) What would be the best approach to address this without changing the policy?
During this period, we closed down our Chennai office and continued operations at the Hyderabad center. In 2023, we decided to ask Hyderabad employees to come to the office, while Chennai employees continued to work from home.
Leave Policy Concerns
My question pertains to our leave policy. Currently, there is not much work, but Hyderabad employees are required to come to the office with no WFH option. If they take time off, it gets noticed, and their leaves are consumed in our HRMS when they apply for leave. On the other hand, Chennai employees rarely apply for leave and always appear available when called upon. It's challenging to determine if they are at home or elsewhere since there isn't much work, and they have access to emails and Microsoft Teams on their mobile devices.
Current Leave Structure
We offer 12 Paid Leaves, 6 Casual Leaves, and 6 Sick Leaves per year (with monthly credits of 1 PL, 0.5 CL, and 0.5 SL). Paid Leaves accumulate, with a maximum of 30 leaves carried forward to the next year and can be encashed upon leaving the organization. Chennai employees have accumulated 30+ leaves over the years, while Hyderabad employees seem to be utilizing their leaves.
Questions Regarding Fairness and Policy Changes
My questions are:
a) Are we being unfair to Hyderabad employees?
b) If we change the policy for the next year to state that only 15 leaves can be carried forward, and the rest must be used by December or will lapse, is this entirely unfair to Chennai employees who have accumulated these leaves?
c) What would be the best approach to address this without changing the policy?