Hi team, My friend was working with a private bank, considered the number one bank. He faced a vigilance inquiry due to a complaint from a clever person. The matter was already sub-judicial in the honorable court and under trial. The bank conducted an inquiry and declared my friend guilty of misconduct. His boss demanded my friend's resignation over the phone, citing their action against him in the vigilance inquiry. The resignation was obtained from him via email without a digital signature, bypassing the bank's exit policy. He was relieved with immediate effect, without any notice period or salary.
When my friend approached the labor commissioner, the bank changed its stance. They claimed an inquiry had been conducted, he was found guilty of misconduct, but before any action could be taken, he voluntarily resigned from service. The bank accepted his resignation and waived his notice period, citing discretion allowed in the appointment letter. The resignation was taken in breach of the bank's resignation policy, without an exit interview or charge handover. Can my friend fight in court for his illegal removal and seek compensation?
When my friend approached the labor commissioner, the bank changed its stance. They claimed an inquiry had been conducted, he was found guilty of misconduct, but before any action could be taken, he voluntarily resigned from service. The bank accepted his resignation and waived his notice period, citing discretion allowed in the appointment letter. The resignation was taken in breach of the bank's resignation policy, without an exit interview or charge handover. Can my friend fight in court for his illegal removal and seek compensation?