Hi friends, I am facing a professional tax assessment, and the authority is telling me to make a payment of PT on leave encashment shown in the full and final dues of left employees. The case, in brief, is as follows:
Case Details
1. All left employees' salaries are processed without leave encashment, and PT is deducted as per the slab and remitted. It is after exit clearance is received that the left employees' final settlement is done, which includes leave encashment. Now, the authority is saying to pay PT on the leave encashment amount reflected in the full and final settlement of employees. The question is, when we have already deducted PT @200, which is the maximum limit under the PT slabs, in any case, the leave encashment amount will not be applicable for further PT deduction for such an employee.
2. If encashment is done while processing salary, yes, we have to deduct PT on gross salary. But, in our case, leave encashment of left employees is done in full and final payment. In such a case, will leave encashment be applicable for PT deduction?
Can anyone shed light on the above case or share a case law or a supporting document?
Case Details
1. All left employees' salaries are processed without leave encashment, and PT is deducted as per the slab and remitted. It is after exit clearance is received that the left employees' final settlement is done, which includes leave encashment. Now, the authority is saying to pay PT on the leave encashment amount reflected in the full and final settlement of employees. The question is, when we have already deducted PT @200, which is the maximum limit under the PT slabs, in any case, the leave encashment amount will not be applicable for further PT deduction for such an employee.
2. If encashment is done while processing salary, yes, we have to deduct PT on gross salary. But, in our case, leave encashment of left employees is done in full and final payment. In such a case, will leave encashment be applicable for PT deduction?
Can anyone shed light on the above case or share a case law or a supporting document?