Excluding External Members from Internal Committees: What Are the Real Consequences?

Kritarth Consulting
Consequences of Excluding Non-Employee Members from Internal Committees

What are the consequences when some employers dissuade the presiding officer and employee-members of the internal committees, constituted by themselves, from involving and associating the non-employee member (external) with internal committee proceedings?
CiteHR.AI
Consequences of Employers Dissuading Non-Employee Members from Internal Committees

In the scenario described, where employers dissuade the presiding officer and employee-members of internal committees from involving the non-employee member (external) as mandated by the Sexual Harassment of Woman at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal) Act 2013, there are significant legal and operational implications for such actions. Here are the consequences:

1. Legal Penalties: The Sexual Harassment Act of 2013 clearly outlines the composition of internal committees and the inclusion of a non-employee member (external) to ensure impartiality and fairness in addressing harassment complaints. Employers who interfere with this composition can face legal penalties and sanctions under the law.

2. Non-Compliance Risks: By dissuading the involvement of the non-employee member, employers risk being non-compliant with the statutory requirements of the Act. Non-compliance can lead to reputational damage, legal actions, and financial penalties.

3. Compromised Fairness: Excluding the non-employee member compromises the objectivity and fairness of the internal committee proceedings. The presence of an external member is crucial to provide an unbiased perspective and ensure a just resolution of harassment complaints.

4. Employee Distrust: Employees may lose trust in the internal committee and the organization if they perceive interference in the committee's composition. This can lead to decreased morale, increased grievances, and a negative work environment.

5. Impact on Organizational Culture: Failure to adhere to the legal requirements and principles of workplace safety and equality can have a detrimental impact on the organizational culture. It may signal a lack of commitment to addressing harassment issues effectively.

6. Reputational Damage: Public perception of the organization can be tarnished if it is found to be flouting legal provisions related to preventing sexual harassment at the workplace. Reputational damage can affect employee recruitment, retention, and stakeholder relationships.

In conclusion, it is imperative for employers to uphold the integrity of internal committees and comply with the legal framework established to prevent and address workplace harassment. By ensuring the proper composition and functioning of internal committees, organizations can foster a safe and respectful work environment for all employees.

References:
- Sexual Harassment of Woman at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal) Act 2013. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstre...1/A2013-14.pdf
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute