Time Limit for Determining Contributions
As per the second proviso to Section 45-A(1), the time limit of 5 years is strictly to be adhered to in determining the contributions and issuing speaking orders of the authorized officer. The said officer shall not ask for any records beyond the period of 5 years from the employer.
Notices for Payment of Interest on Delayed Contributions
Two notices have been received for payment of interest on delayed contributions for the year 2012-2013.
In one case, the ESI issued a show-cause notice in the year 2013 to pay interest on the delayed contribution, but no action was taken thereafter by the ESI. However, a demand letter was sent in the year 2022 to the employer.
In another case, the first interest payment notice on delayed payment was received in the year 2022 only, while the contribution pertains to the financial year 2012-2013.
Legal Defense Against Notices
Is there any defense for the employer against these two notices under Section 45-A, or will payment have to be made? Kindly suggest a detailed legal view on the subject.
As per the second proviso to Section 45-A(1), the time limit of 5 years is strictly to be adhered to in determining the contributions and issuing speaking orders of the authorized officer. The said officer shall not ask for any records beyond the period of 5 years from the employer.
Notices for Payment of Interest on Delayed Contributions
Two notices have been received for payment of interest on delayed contributions for the year 2012-2013.
In one case, the ESI issued a show-cause notice in the year 2013 to pay interest on the delayed contribution, but no action was taken thereafter by the ESI. However, a demand letter was sent in the year 2022 to the employer.
In another case, the first interest payment notice on delayed payment was received in the year 2022 only, while the contribution pertains to the financial year 2012-2013.
Legal Defense Against Notices
Is there any defense for the employer against these two notices under Section 45-A, or will payment have to be made? Kindly suggest a detailed legal view on the subject.