Flexitime working is not practiced widely, mainly due to its limitations. As rightly said by Dr. Shivkumar, flexitime imposes one common time for all employees, who are allowed to come and work for 8 hours, which must include the common time. This system works well in office settings where different departments are not heavily dependent on each other. However, it may pose challenges when interaction, common meetings, policy explanations, or official business involving everyone are required at a specific common time. Such a work pattern is rarely found. For instance, a cashier must be available throughout working hours, and a manager's availability is crucial for decision-making. Additionally, there are extra expenses associated with continuous services like air conditioning, pantry, security, janitors, etc.
I propose an alternative approach. Instead of flexitime, we could consider implementing a concept I refer to as "flexiabsenteeism." On average, employees are entitled to 7 days of casual leave, 4 days of sick leave, 21 days of privilege leave, and 8 paid holidays, totaling 40 days. At the start of the year, employees would be informed that they have 40 days credited to them, which they can utilize based on their requirements. This system would ensure continuous operation of the office/factory. Certain conditions could be established, such as requiring prior approval and stipulating a minimum duration for continuous leave (e.g., 5 days for at least 3 instances). This approach could significantly reduce absenteeism and enhance employee satisfaction.
Vibhakar Ramtirthkar, Pune.