I am not able to cull out anything from the phrase " wrong credentials " mentioned in the query. Basically, employment is a contract based on the willingness of the employer and the concerned employee. The contract continues as long as there is willingness of both the parties. But when the contract falls within the ambit of labor laws, certain statutory restrictions are imposed on this option. Particularly, the employer is precluded from terminating the contract on his own in an arbitrary fashion and so far as the employee is concerned, only restriction is his strict compliance with the notice clause of exit or his attempt to resignation as a ruse to avoid the stigmatic consequence of any disciplinary action either apprehended or pending. Even in cases of the contract of employment concerning higher category employees, sec.23 of the Indian Contract Act,1872 puts some restrictions upon the exit clause on the grounds of public policy. Therefore, the employer has no locus standi to sit as a judge over the reasons for resignation and on this score reject it. Even the employee casts some aspersions on the employer in the resignation letter, the employer can assure some remedy if the allegations are true and reasonable and persuade the employee to withdraw his resignation and if not, deny them stoutly while accepting the resignation. What is the use of keeping an unwilling employee by compulsion?