Hi,
Madhu Sir is absolutely correct. Prima Facie you will not have direct jurisdiction to impose disciplinary actions on contractual labour supplied by an independent contractor. But, please also refer Management of Visl vs Presiding Officer ILR 1994 KAR 1919. In this case the honorable court remarked
"In our opinion, there is no substance in that contention. If a master employs a servant and authorizes him to employ a number of persons to do a particular job and to guarantee their fidelity and efficiency for a cash consideration, the employees thus appointed by the servant would be equally with the employer, servants of the master. It is not always correct to say that persons appointed and liable to be dismissed by an independent contractor can in no circumstances be the employees of the third party. This would be clear from the following observations of Lord Esher, M.R., in the case of -'DONOVAN v. LAING, WHARTON, and DOWN CONSTRUCTION SYNDICATE, 1893-1 QB 629 at p. 632(B)"
So, if all conditions prescribed in this judgment are fulfiled you can also initiate disciplinary actions. In any case the termination has to be adjudged in the light of the Industrial Dispute Act, Factories Act, Standing Orders and Disaster Management Act (Including Notifications).
Read this
Layoff and Termination of Employment during Covid-19 Pandemic – Part 1 (Financial Crisis),
Layoff and Termination of Employment during Covid-19 Pandemic – Part 2 (Retrenchment under Industrial Dispute Act) and you can also go through these cases on Absenteeism
Important Case Laws on Absence and Abandonment along with Summary