Understanding Section 3(2) of the ECA
We are overlooking Section 3(2) of the ECA. It states:
(3)(2) "If an employee employed in any employment specified in Part A of Schedule III contracts any disease specified therein as an occupational disease..."
Thus, unless the central government specifies otherwise, it will not fall within Section 3(2). There are many more conditions in the section.
Conditions like Heart Attacks or Strokes
However, for conditions like heart attacks or strokes, if they could be related to the employment, compensation may be applicable. Labor jurisprudence follows the principle of preponderance. Hence, these are the documents and evidence available with the employer, and the employee will decide whether it will be covered under the ECA. If the employee can prove that the employer, while permitted to operate the facility, did not follow the rules and guidelines for social distancing, personal hygiene, disinfection of workplaces, transport provisions, masks, hand washing, etc., or did not conduct awareness programs, which might have contributed to an infection resulting in COVID-19, he may receive compensation. Similarly, if the employer can prove otherwise with documents and other substantial evidence that compliance was made, the liability cannot be fastened on him. In short, each case will be judged on its merit. Thus, employers must be meticulous in documentation. Whatever they do must be documented.
Regards, P K Jadia
Labor Law Consultant, Silvassa, UT of DNH and DD
[Phone Number Removed For Privacy-Reasons], [Email Removed For Privacy Reasons]