Most of the respondents seem to have responded from the point of view of discipline rather than the limitations of an employer's statutory right to impose fines as well as his moral right to look into specs with a punitive attitude. As it is I am quite unable to differ with them so far as discipline in employment is concerned. However, I should point out that most of the employers running certain types of industries do not adhere to the statutory working hours and do not pay any O.T wages for extra work nor they respect the notice clauses of the contract of employment and permit the employees to have a peaceful exit is the ground reality exhibited through frequent and similar painful questions raised in this Web site.
Coming to the present question raised from the frustration of a hapless employee created by ruthless bossing-over, I am not sure that as of now whether the poster falls within the purview of the definition " employed person " under the Payment of Wages Act,1936 or a "workman" under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders ) Act,1946 to seek appropriate legal relief against such actions of the employer. [ Fortunately, the yet to be enforced Labor Code on Wages takes away the ceiling on wages/salary of the employees ].
Of course, Sec.7(2)(a) of the PW Act,1936 recognizes "fines" as an authorized deduction under the Act. But levy of fines by the employer is subject to the conditions laid down in sub-sections (1) to (8) of Section 8 of the same Act. If the employer fails to comply with any of these statutory conditions it will tantamount to unauthorized deduction leading to a claim u/s 15 of the Act.