Dear Anita, while I largely share the views of Mr. Umakanthan, I believe before deciding on instituting a domestic inquiry, one must examine and analyze the following facts:
1. Whether the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act is applicable to the establishment (in Maharashtra, it applies to establishments such as factories, shops, and commercial establishments employing 50 or more workmen).
2. Whether immediately after noticing his absence, any letters were sent to the employee pointing out that his absence is unauthorized, without any permission or intimation, and asking him to report for duty, failing which disciplinary action will be taken.
3. To establish in the inquiry that his absence is habitual, whether his past record is available and supports it. Remember, habitual absence (3 times within the prior 12 months period as per Model Standing Orders) only warrants harsh disciplinary action like dismissal after providing enough opportunity to improve.
4. If the present absence is for the first or second time, it would be appropriate to warn him and let him off.
The above considerations are more from a legal perspective, and I am certain Mr. Umakanthan had this in mind when he shared his views.
Regards, Vinayak Nagarkar HR Consultant