Key Labour Law Judgments from August 2019: What They Mean for Employers and Employees

rajan@arghaa.com
Reported Judgments at a Glance August 2019

Any change in the appointment letter by corrigendum is not permissible. Guj. HC 888.

No automatic absorption of contractor labour is allowed in the prohibition contract labour system. Supreme Court 892.

Dismissal is justified for misappropriation of funds by an employee. Mad. HC 862.

No reinstatement is granted if the workman has lost the confidence of the management. Del. HC 885.

Sit-in protests inside the factory premises, beyond working hours, are considered a criminal offense. Mad. HC 869.

For more reported judgments, please click on the link: https://arghaa.com/news/latest-labou...ugust-2019/689.

Happy Reading

**Location**: Chennai, India

epf judgments, labour judgments, supreme court, appointment letter, working hours, labour law, Country-India, City-India-Chennai,
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute