Supreme Court Ruling on Provident Fund Deductions
A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Naveen Sinha ruled that employers cannot segregate 'special allowance' from basic wages for the purpose of PF deductions. The apex court has ruled that employers cannot segregate 'special allowance' from basic wages for the purpose of PF deductions. The Supreme Court has passed an order on Provident Fund (PF) calculation that will have a far-reaching impact on companies and the salaried class. A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Naveen Sinha yesterday ruled that employers cannot segregate 'special allowance' from basic wages for the purpose of PF deductions. The court was hearing a clutch of appeals questioning whether "the special allowances paid by an establishment to its employees would fall within the expression 'basic wages' under Section 2(b)(ii) read with Section 6 of the Act for the computation of deduction towards Provident Fund."
A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Naveen Sinha ruled that employers cannot segregate 'special allowance' from basic wages for the purpose of PF deductions. The apex court has ruled that employers cannot segregate 'special allowance' from basic wages for the purpose of PF deductions. The Supreme Court has passed an order on Provident Fund (PF) calculation that will have a far-reaching impact on companies and the salaried class. A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Naveen Sinha yesterday ruled that employers cannot segregate 'special allowance' from basic wages for the purpose of PF deductions. The court was hearing a clutch of appeals questioning whether "the special allowances paid by an establishment to its employees would fall within the expression 'basic wages' under Section 2(b)(ii) read with Section 6 of the Act for the computation of deduction towards Provident Fund."
1 Attachment(s) [Login To View]