Dear Pandipati,
The ID Act, 1947 is applicable only in respect of those employees who fall within the definition of the term "workman" as defined under Section 2(s) of the Act. Therefore, other employees cannot seek any relief through the ID Act for their employment grievances. All their conditions of employment would be strictly according to the terms mentioned in their contract of employment, appointment orders, or service regulations only.
When employees above the cadre of "workman" are unilaterally sent out by the employer for any reason other than by way of punishment, they have to be given sufficient notice or salary in lieu of notice as already mentioned in the contract of employment only. Any failure on the part of the employer in this regard would be a breach of the contract, against which a Civil Suit is the only available remedy for the aggrieved employees.
However, you are entitled to gratuity under the PG Act, 1972 since you have more than 5 years of service in the same organization.
The ID Act, 1947 is applicable only in respect of those employees who fall within the definition of the term "workman" as defined under Section 2(s) of the Act. Therefore, other employees cannot seek any relief through the ID Act for their employment grievances. All their conditions of employment would be strictly according to the terms mentioned in their contract of employment, appointment orders, or service regulations only.
When employees above the cadre of "workman" are unilaterally sent out by the employer for any reason other than by way of punishment, they have to be given sufficient notice or salary in lieu of notice as already mentioned in the contract of employment only. Any failure on the part of the employer in this regard would be a breach of the contract, against which a Civil Suit is the only available remedy for the aggrieved employees.
However, you are entitled to gratuity under the PG Act, 1972 since you have more than 5 years of service in the same organization.