With due regard to the view of the learned member from M/S Kritarth Consulting, I have a different perception about the concept of probation in employment and hence I would like to uphold the necessity for a compulsory period of probation immediately following the joining of a new entrant in any organization not only freshers but also experienced candidates. Freshers, despite their brilliant academic records, would certainly need some time to gain practical knowledge and the nuances of their behaviour within the closed social group of employees of the same organization. Thus, it is a predetermined and limited phase or brief duration of time demanding more of orientation to the post held and understanding the work culture of the organization than that of the mere discharge of the mundane responsibilities attached to it. Therefore, it would not be simply appropriate on the part of the employer declaring subjectively in a day or two that the new comer would not fit into the organization and showing the exit nor would it be appropriate on the part of the newcomer to simply walk out the moment he thinks the job is demanding or the work atmosphere is tense.
Coming to the latest query of the questioner, being a senior, his friend would have asked to revise the offer on his lines or simply rejected it instead of joining.
However at this juncture, there are two possibilities in my opinion:
(a)The management may consider the changes solicited and agree at the end of the probation period and confirm him or simply discharge him citing the termination clause in the offer.
OR
(b) May accept the resignation subject to fulfillment of the notice condition in entirety and demand 15 day's salary towards unserved notice period or adjust it in his last month's salary.