Legal Position on Gratuity Eligibility
The legal position is settled after the judgment of the High Court of Madras in Mettur Beardsell Ltd. vs. The Authority under PGA 1998 LLR 1072. Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, provides that an employee will be entitled to gratuity on completion of continuous service of 5 years. The Madras High Court, while relying upon the clarification by the Supreme Court pertaining to 240 working days in one year, deemed it to be continuous service of one year. This means that there need not be a complete 12 calendar months' service. The Madras High Court has further held that an employee who has put in service of 4 years, 10 months, and 18 days in the 5 years will be entitled to gratuity.
Supreme Court Judgment on Continuous Service
By virtue of the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act in Surendra Kumar Verma vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal, [(1980) (4) S.C.C.433)], it is enough that an employee has a service of 240 days in the preceding 12 months, and it is not necessary that he should have completed one whole year's service. As the definition of continuous service in the Industrial Dispute Act and the Payment of Gratuity Act are synonymous, the same principle can be adopted under the PG Act. Hence, an employee rendering service of 4 years and 8 months is considered to have completed 5 years of continuous service under Section 4(2) and thereby is eligible for gratuity.