Aadhaar Linking and Its Implications
Remaining anonymous doesn't mean I'm living in a virtual world, and the rule of the land says I have to link Aadhaar in order to get certain facilities. I never said that I would take these facilities without linking Aadhaar. I only questioned whether the government can force me to link my Aadhaar if I don't want those specified facilities. For example, if I don't want the LPG subsidy, can the government force me to link my Aadhaar?
You are mistaken. I am not against any law of the land; I'm completely in favor of it. However, the government states that I must link Aadhaar with UAN if I wish to remain a subscriber of EPS and EPF. That's fine with me. But what if I don't link it? Will I not remain a subscriber? That was my query. Avoiding linking Aadhaar with anything doesn't make me a non-law-abiding citizen. The government says if I want to have a bank account, I must have an Aadhaar. If I don't link Aadhaar, then I can't have a bank account. I'm okay with it. But please understand this rule itself says that if I don't want to become a subscriber of any of the banks, then I don't need to link Aadhaar. Even if I don't have a bank account, I still remain a law-abiding citizen. That was my question: Is there any such rule in the case of EPFO and Aadhaar?
So again, I'm requesting that having a different view than you doesn't make me a non-law-abiding citizen. Therefore, you are most welcome to place your views here, but please don't tell me what you believe in terms of linking UAN with Aadhaar, as I'm not interested. If you know anything specific about my original query, then you are most welcome to share.
Last but not least, please don't try to teach me how to follow the rule of the land. I believe you either haven't understood my original question, or you have, but you don't know the answer and hence are sharing your ways of thinking, which I'm not interested in hearing.
Thank you. Cheers.