Dear Uday, the minimum wage fixed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, has to be considered as a single package for the purpose of comparison with the actual industry wages paid, despite the components in the structures of both scales. However, the components excluded from the term "wages" under section 2(h) of the MW Act, 1948, which are present in the industry wage structure, should not be taken into consideration when determining the parity between the two rates. This principle was established in the judgment of the Supreme Court in Airfreight Ltd., vs State of Karnataka and Others (1999 LLR 1008). In essence, the total of the minimum wages should be equal to the total of the industry wages, excluding the excluded items.
Regarding the suggestion of the ALC on the bifurcation of the minimum wages
It may be his personal opinion. If I recall correctly, the higher judiciary recently emphasized that the executive should not modify the legislation passed by the Legislature, as seen in a case concerning the executive instructions of the EPFO on computing EPF contributions strictly based on the minimum wages set. Wages are determined by the demand and supply of labor in the job market through collective bargaining. The definition of "wages" varies from one Act to another depending on its purpose. This is why the Supreme Court concluded that minimum wages essentially constitute a unified package, regardless of their components.
Thank you.