Our company is a public sector undertaking based in Kolkata. We have some checking procedures that must be ensured before engaging any contractor or contract labor. For instance, when engaging a contractor, the contractor must submit a work order copy, Establishment PF/ESI code number, labor license, etc., at the beginning of their work. Additionally, copies of wage registers, PF and ESI challans, contribution sheets, etc., are required on a monthly basis. When applying for a gate pass for contract labor or renewing gate passes for contract labor, the contractor must fill out a form that includes the contract labor's PF and ESI numbers with supporting documents. The contractor must also provide an updated workmen register. These processes apply to all contractors engaged for job work or manpower services. It is essential to mention that ensuring thorough checks requires time by our department.
Recently, we signed an MOU and issued a work order to another public sector undertaking for building construction jobs within our premises. This PSU has engaged a sub-contractor who is providing manpower and ensuring necessary statutory compliance. In my opinion, this PSU should follow all procedures and compliance like other contractors. However, this PSU has requested in writing to be treated separately and exempted from full compliance checks to reduce the lead time in engaging labor. They argue that being a public sector undertaking, we can trust their statutory compliance, referring to the MOU document where they have taken responsibility for statutory compliance.
Given the above, as the principal employer, do we have the authority to treat a contractor differently simply because it is a PSU? The situation is becoming complex as the PSU (contractor) is seeking resolution from our senior management. We have a meeting scheduled with the contractor this evening where we need to provide a clear stance on whether any special treatment can be granted to them or not. Your prompt response would be appreciated.
Regards, DG
Location: Delhi, India
Tags: workmen register, lead time, contract labor, statutory compliance, talk to the seniors, labor and employee relations, City-India-Delhi, Country-India
Recently, we signed an MOU and issued a work order to another public sector undertaking for building construction jobs within our premises. This PSU has engaged a sub-contractor who is providing manpower and ensuring necessary statutory compliance. In my opinion, this PSU should follow all procedures and compliance like other contractors. However, this PSU has requested in writing to be treated separately and exempted from full compliance checks to reduce the lead time in engaging labor. They argue that being a public sector undertaking, we can trust their statutory compliance, referring to the MOU document where they have taken responsibility for statutory compliance.
Given the above, as the principal employer, do we have the authority to treat a contractor differently simply because it is a PSU? The situation is becoming complex as the PSU (contractor) is seeking resolution from our senior management. We have a meeting scheduled with the contractor this evening where we need to provide a clear stance on whether any special treatment can be granted to them or not. Your prompt response would be appreciated.
Regards, DG
Location: Delhi, India
Tags: workmen register, lead time, contract labor, statutory compliance, talk to the seniors, labor and employee relations, City-India-Delhi, Country-India