Thanks for sharing the ruling by Bombay High Court.
The ruling came in the year 1958, whereas the present Act was passed in 1961, though the main contents of the principal Act of 1930 were maintained. The highlight of the judgment is not the eligibility of the employee to get leave wages, but the authority who ordered the payment of wages. I would say that the woman had approached the wrong authority, i.e., the authority under the Payment of Wages Act. It is not disputed that a woman employee is entitled to leave with wages for 84 days (now it has become 26 weeks) and the employer is bound to pay it.
Views on PF Contributions
Now, coming to the views on PF, we can see that whatever the employee gets while on duty or on leave, which has cash value, is remuneration that will attract PF contributions. If you are on earned leave for, say, 90 days, you will certainly get a full salary for the entire 90 days, or 3 months, but the payment will be made after deducting PF. This is because PF is paid on the salary earned while on duty or on leave. At the same time, leave encashment will not attract PF deduction because that is not earned by working or being on leave. Similarly, retrenchment compensation will not attract PF deduction because this is not an amount earned while on duty or on leave.
Therefore, I support that if your employee is paid maternity benefit in the form of a salary for certain days/months, the same should be paid after deducting PF. Certainly, for the amount of the medical bonus of Rs 3500 that you pay, there is no need to deduct PF because it is not a salary but a benefit in the form of reimbursement of expenses met by the employee for her prenatal and postnatal care.
Regards, Madhu.T.K