Observations on MBA Student Project Evaluations
A few years ago, I sat as an observer when MBA students were being interviewed by external examiners in an institution in India. To my surprise, the external examiner had not even seen the project report before the student arrived. I examined some project reports and found that the quality of citation was poor, and the references/bibliography were inadequate. These issues were never even picked up or commented upon.
I have, as a member at CiteHR, tried to help with students' queries. I have even offered FREE SERVICES to proofread and make constructive comments. Only a couple of students took the opportunity two or three years ago. Since then, I have found some students seeking help with their projects, particularly in terms of asking how to develop a questionnaire. They hardly answer questions posed and expect spoon-feeding.
I wonder whether the standard has improved or, as someone said, "The students are quite adept at copying and pasting and even copy the whole project of previous batch students and claim it as their own." I also know of instances where the institutions could not care less if students plagiarize, as long as they get their fees paid.
Sitting in the UK, it's easy for me to comment. I wonder whether members of CiteHR would like to comment on my observations.
Regards
A few years ago, I sat as an observer when MBA students were being interviewed by external examiners in an institution in India. To my surprise, the external examiner had not even seen the project report before the student arrived. I examined some project reports and found that the quality of citation was poor, and the references/bibliography were inadequate. These issues were never even picked up or commented upon.
I have, as a member at CiteHR, tried to help with students' queries. I have even offered FREE SERVICES to proofread and make constructive comments. Only a couple of students took the opportunity two or three years ago. Since then, I have found some students seeking help with their projects, particularly in terms of asking how to develop a questionnaire. They hardly answer questions posed and expect spoon-feeding.
I wonder whether the standard has improved or, as someone said, "The students are quite adept at copying and pasting and even copy the whole project of previous batch students and claim it as their own." I also know of instances where the institutions could not care less if students plagiarize, as long as they get their fees paid.
Sitting in the UK, it's easy for me to comment. I wonder whether members of CiteHR would like to comment on my observations.
Regards