Contractual Obligations and Legal Validity
One of my friends works as an administrative manager at a cooperative bank. Upon joining, he received an appointment letter requiring him to agree to unspecified terms. He was informed of a one-year probation period, with potential extensions based on performance. However, during the formalities, he was compelled to sign a one-sided five-year contract. This contract stipulated that he must either forego or pay three months' salary with three months' notice and 2 lakhs if he left before the agreement period. Unfortunately, he had no choice but to sign the agreement, having already resigned from his previous company.
After a year, his contract was extended for another year, and later for two more years, totaling three years of service. Despite assurances of becoming permanent after one year, he remains under a contract agreement.
If he decides to leave, the bank now insists he must provide three months' notice without pay and pay 2 lakhs, as per the agreement terms.
Questions and Concerns
1) Is this type of agreement valid in law?
2) What are the consequences if he leaves the bank?
3) The bank is unwilling to provide a relieving or experience certificate.
4) He is unable to include this experience on his CV without a relieving or experience certificate.
Can the experts guide him on what steps he should take next?
One of my friends works as an administrative manager at a cooperative bank. Upon joining, he received an appointment letter requiring him to agree to unspecified terms. He was informed of a one-year probation period, with potential extensions based on performance. However, during the formalities, he was compelled to sign a one-sided five-year contract. This contract stipulated that he must either forego or pay three months' salary with three months' notice and 2 lakhs if he left before the agreement period. Unfortunately, he had no choice but to sign the agreement, having already resigned from his previous company.
After a year, his contract was extended for another year, and later for two more years, totaling three years of service. Despite assurances of becoming permanent after one year, he remains under a contract agreement.
If he decides to leave, the bank now insists he must provide three months' notice without pay and pay 2 lakhs, as per the agreement terms.
Questions and Concerns
1) Is this type of agreement valid in law?
2) What are the consequences if he leaves the bank?
3) The bank is unwilling to provide a relieving or experience certificate.
4) He is unable to include this experience on his CV without a relieving or experience certificate.
Can the experts guide him on what steps he should take next?