We had an employee placed in our Bangalore office who was relieved seven months ago. We paid him all dues such as wages for earned leaves, gratuity, and PF transfer, etc., all within the prescribed timeframe. We relieved him because he was not fit to be adjusted in the restructured company. He did not show any resistance at the time of being given one month's notice from the factory cum HO.
After seven months, he appealed to the Labour Officer under section 39 of the Karnataka Shop and Establishment Rules, claiming that he should be reinstated, paid back wages, and all benefits. Is he right to claim after so long? I think the statutory time limit for appeal is one month. Can the delay be condoned by the appellate authority? Apparently, his move is a second thought as he received all dues, including gratuity. As such, he should not get respite.
Regards, M D Modi
After seven months, he appealed to the Labour Officer under section 39 of the Karnataka Shop and Establishment Rules, claiming that he should be reinstated, paid back wages, and all benefits. Is he right to claim after so long? I think the statutory time limit for appeal is one month. Can the delay be condoned by the appellate authority? Apparently, his move is a second thought as he received all dues, including gratuity. As such, he should not get respite.
Regards, M D Modi