I believe what Saunee wants to know is the effect of not only reflecting statutory bonus as a monthly component but also its actual proportionate monthly disbursement along with the regular salary throughout the accounting year. Bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 is determined based on the performance of the industrial establishment in the accounting year and is calculated as a percentage of the total earnings of eligible employees in that year. While the monthly payment of bonus may rely on estimations, I personally don't consider it inappropriate or legally incorrect. It could be termed as either an interim bonus or a bonus advance that can be adjusted later against the bonus determined and paid after the accounting year ends. This approach may ease the burden of a one-time bulk payment for the employer, as they are obligated to pay the minimum bonus even in case of losses, while also supplementing the monthly earnings of employees.
However, this practice may be more convenient if there exists a standing settlement, whether bilateral or tripartite, allowing for the predetermined annual bonus strictly in adherence to the Act's provisions concerning minimum or maximum bonuses based solely on performance during its term. Additionally, it could serve as a strategic move by the employer to gain an advantage in the collective bargaining process for wage revision or to evade the annual demand for bonus. Success in this approach hinges on several positive factors such as the employer's confidence in the stability and profitability of their operations, strict compliance with the provisions of set-on and set-off, and most importantly, the employer's commitment to fulfilling their promise despite the possibility of unforeseen business downturns beyond their control.
Furthermore, the bonus amount paid monthly with the salary or wage should not constitute a component of the wage or salary structure, except for the purpose of CTC.
Best regards,
[Your Name]