Please don't mind if I ask, are you really serious, or has the document been prepared just to lure customers for your manpower company? I suppose it is merely a hypothetical supposition.
The qualities listed in the document are ideal, and any boss would like their subordinate employees to possess all such qualities. But the question arises: is it possible for a recruiter, at the time of recruitment, to judge even one of these qualities in candidates for employment until they really demonstrate such traits during their performance in employment after they are recruited?
If so, being related to a manpower company, can you please suggest guidance for the recruiters?
Criteria for Evaluating Candidate Qualities
What yardsticks, methods, or criteria should a recruiter apply to enable them to judge such qualities in candidates at the time of recruitment, whether the candidate is:
- "go-getter"
- "reliable"
- "a cheerleader"
- "strategy-oriented"
- "a leader"
- "creative"
- "a problem solver"
- "agile"
- "versatile"
Agreeing with Shri V. Raghunathan, I may say, even after their recruitment, none of the employees can prove to possess even 2-3 of the nine qualities/traits listed by you, where even most bosses cannot be considered to possess even 50% of such qualities.
My belief is that even if a single employee possesses all such qualities, they would not need any boss to be put over their head, and even if a boss is still there, that employee would definitely supersede the boss in further promotions during their employment.
So, would you please like to enlist the methods a recruiter should adopt to be able to recruit persons with all such qualities, or should bosses work on getting such rare types of employees?