Authority in Issuing Dismissal Orders
An appointing authority is delegated with the power of appointment. If the same authority is responsible for issuing a dismissal order, there certainly will be a gap. Hence, whenever there is a dismissal, and the dismissal is a punishment, the authorized or delegated power should be used for such issuance of the order. If the same authority who appoints a person is authorized to issue the dismissal, there is no other way but for the order to be executed. These are positions carrying power, and we must not violate the sanctity of the authorities.
Let us take a simple example: if he/she is appointed to a cadre, say Group-C (according to the post), with continuance of service, and is then promoted to Group-B non-gazetted official, the appointing authority differs in the span. He/she is not being appointed anew but has received a promotion in service. On finding prima facie negligence in work, when the person is compelled to be dismissed, the authority, in fact, differs. The delegated authority can execute the order, not the appointing authority on the cadre entry as Group-C. In the private sector, the board of directors delegates the power, and this differs in the industry.
Best of luck...