Thank you very much for your compliments and further queries, which have truly inspired me to delve deep into the subject of leave and holidays in the realm of industrial employment and to offer my views to the best of my knowledge and understanding.
Determinants of Leave Policy
Generally, the Leave Policy of an Industrial Undertaking is formulated by several determinants such as applicable Employment Laws, the nature of activities in which people are engaged, socio-religious customs, age-old cultural practices, bargaining power of Trade Unions, the magnitude of the Management's people-orientation, and the like. The Leave Policy, apart from deciding the nature and number of leaves and holidays allowed in a year as per the existing legal standards or in excess, also lays down the permissible norms of enjoyment such as prior-intimation or formal application, approval or prior-sanction, combination of leaves and holidays, leave encashment, etc.
Difference Between Leave and Holiday
Although the terms "leave" and "holiday" are often used interchangeably, there is actually a subtle difference in their meanings. The word "holiday" originates from the religious term "holyday," signifying a day of complete rest without any work. The only holy aspect of it in the realm of employment is that the employee need not make any application to the employer to avail of a holiday that has already been declared. On the contrary, "leave" denotes prior permission or leave of absence from work when the necessity arises. In short, a holiday indicates general permission to be away from work on specified occasions, while leave implies specific permission to be away from work necessitated by personal reasons of the individual employee. Its sanction is subject to the discretion of the employer depending on the exigencies of work, and therefore, leave cannot normally be claimed as a matter of right. Thus, holidays and leave form parts of the several negotiable conditions of employment.
Classification of Labor Legislations
The entire Labor Legislations in our country can be classified into major categories, namely:
1. Establishment-oriented Labor Laws such as the Factories Act, 1948, the Mines Act, 1952, Shops and Establishments Acts, etc.
2. Monetary or Wage-related Labor Laws such as the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, etc.
3. Service-conditions related Laws such as the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, National and Festival Holidays Acts, Payment of Subsistence Allowance Acts, etc.
4. Industrial Relations Laws such as the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Trade Unions Act, 1926, etc.
5. Social Security Legislations such as the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, the ESI Act, 1948, the EPF Act, 1952, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, etc.
Every establishment would certainly fall into one of the first category, i.e., Establishment-oriented Legislation. Even among them, the leave provisions differ mainly because of the nature of their activities. While Casual Leave is available in the Shops Acts, there is no CL in the Factories Act. Therefore, the leave policy of the establishment should align with the minimum scales of leave prescribed in the applicable Law. As far as I know, no norms are prescribed in any such LAW regarding the permissible combination of various leaves and/or holidays in a single spell. Similarly, it is the option of the employee to avail a particular type of leave in their credit. Of course, when there is no such leave in their credit, it is at the discretion of the employer to sanction whatever kind of leave is in their credit, and in case of no leave at all, they can sanction leave on loss of pay or wages. However, I do not believe it is proper to deny a holiday simply by treating it as another kind of leave just because it falls in between. Seniors may shed more light on this aspect.
Regards