Dear colleagues,
I wish to clarify the issue a bit more in light of the above posts of Mr. Ghosh and Mr. Mehta. Legally, yes, a contractor has to obtain RC and pay a 1% cess on new construction values if it's Rs.10 lakhs or more. This means that construction activities on the extension of old or upgrading of previous jobs, if done, then cess is not applicable. In case the contractor is liable but has not paid cess if payment is taken from the company, then the company is bound to pay to the authority while the company can claim this with administrative costs from the contractor.
In one of my client companies, the boiler plus chimney installation work was charged on the full bill amount by ALC. The bill was without a bifurcation of materials, labor costs, and other incidental expenses. The activities included jobs like designing, fabrication of a steel chimney, rent paid for a crane for 23 days, and fooding and transportation of men, materials, and lastly cement, bricks, steel, concrete, sand plus mason and labor costs for the exact work of plastering and erecting the chimney. The said contractor had also done part jobs of construction, repair, and wooden works of our GET hostel building, and the total cost was coming around Rs. 30 lakhs. ALC was demanding the full bill amount for the construction cess, but we replied and enclosed a cess payment check for Rs. 6 lakhs. We replied that the actual construction cost was Rs. 6 lakhs, while the bifurcation was also given, and the hostel work was shown as repair activities and claimed as exempted from cess applicability. ALC agreed to our stand.
It is advisable that when construction activities are given to a contractor, then a proper definition of activities will be supporting a lot with its meaning, and you can easily reproduce things as a normal practice in case it is explainable from its beginning through records.
Regds,
RDS YADAV
LABOUR LAW ADVISER
DIRECTOR-FUTURE INSTT. OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY