Thank you very much Mr. Umakanthan. According to you I can apply, if I got a public motor transport industry, the G.O. fixed or revised if my running staff and office staff are covered. If they comprise 70%, for the remaining 30% I have to select a suitable employment where their categories actually fit in. Similarly, in my case I can best apply to my industry the 70% workers coverage G.O. and according to you I have to select another suitable employment G.O. for the 30 % of leftover employees. Am I right? Thus you can say it is not on the basis of selecting higher minimum rate of wage comparing employments but on higher number of workers coverage. Am I right? If comparison of each category with some employments and picking up higher minimum rate of wage out of them for application to each category is the perfect solution there is no need for the Govt. need to fix/revise M.wages in 65 employments in our state of A.P. Can any judgment or administrative instructions of any center or state is available to substantiate this version of applicability of an employment to higher worker coverage?
Thank you very much Mr. Nagaraj. Your version depends upon payment of higher minimum wages to feel the workers happy. But in your discussion also you have agreed to apply the 70 % of workers coverage G.O. But again you have reiterated on the applicability of higher minimum wage to the category of employees. Therefore, it’s a dichotomous statement. If I apply the 70% of coverage of workers G.O. I have to pay the rates which appear to be a little lesser than those fixed in other G.Os and I have to face the impending havoc. If I consider the higher min. wages, as you believed, then I have to dispense with the more suitable G.O. that is applicable to my industry and I could well see that there is no purpose of fixing wages in different employments by the State Govt. However, I request you to supply the relevant judgment or provision under any suitable enactment that you rely upon for revealing your version, either on workers coverage or higher Min. wage coverage, as the case may be, which may help me to apply boldly to my industry with a strong base.
Thank you very much Mr. Nagaraj. Your version depends upon payment of higher minimum wages to feel the workers happy. But in your discussion also you have agreed to apply the 70 % of workers coverage G.O. But again you have reiterated on the applicability of higher minimum wage to the category of employees. Therefore, it’s a dichotomous statement. If I apply the 70% of coverage of workers G.O. I have to pay the rates which appear to be a little lesser than those fixed in other G.Os and I have to face the impending havoc. If I consider the higher min. wages, as you believed, then I have to dispense with the more suitable G.O. that is applicable to my industry and I could well see that there is no purpose of fixing wages in different employments by the State Govt. However, I request you to supply the relevant judgment or provision under any suitable enactment that you rely upon for revealing your version, either on workers coverage or higher Min. wage coverage, as the case may be, which may help me to apply boldly to my industry with a strong base.