Appreciating Suggestions and Considering Legal Options
While appreciating your well-meant suggestions to Pvragav2000, I would also like to point out that most members posting their problems, issues, or situations are looking for actionable and realistic suggestions or solutions.
Both of you have been members of CiteHR for over 5 years now, by which I presume that you would have noticed the tendency of many members to look at the legal option (which always exists for any and every issue or situation) as the first option. Just because the legal option exists doesn't mean that it is the most appropriate option for a given situation, since the options to be exercised by a member for his or her problem will have to factor in his or her collateral situations and circumstances—whether they allow him or her to go legal or not.
The objective of most CiteHR members who participate in the discussions and keep sharing or giving their suggestions, based on their experiences, has always been to provide holistic solutions to the issues raised. In today's management parlance, suggestions based on a 360-degree viewpoint of the issue. I am sure you would realize that legal recourse would be just one of the options in a 360-degree view.
As seniors, we need to keep in mind that whatever we say, suggest, or advise is most often taken at face value, and the newbies just follow them. In case an inappropriate suggestion is given and followed that leads to unpleasant consequences, have we, as seniors who were looked upon to guide, done justice to our collective roles? Food for thought, I guess.
This surely doesn't mean that legal action is not preferred when the situation demands as well as the other circumstances, which are unique to every posting or case. If permitted, then most members who give suggestions would strongly support the legal way, and there have been legal eagles in this forum who have guided the thread initiators on how to go about the whole legal process too on various occasions.
Applying the above points and observations to the current issue, thread, or problem, like Nathrao mentioned, this lecturer neither contributed to the EPF nor did his employer. Then how would his problem get resolved if he approaches the EPF officials? All that would get highlighted would be that this college didn't go as per rules.
It doesn't take an Einstein to know if and when this college is forced to begin contributing to the EPF, both by employee and employer.
All this lecturer would be doing is ensuring that those who join after him would benefit. Nothing wrong with this unselfish act per se. But was that the initial objective to begin with? Do you think that he would get his EPF even when the EPF Commissioner takes action on this college in an as-is-where-is scenario? Surely not, since he hasn't made any contributions.
Maybe, hypothetically, he still can get his EPF, provided the college makes deductions with retrospective effect for all the 15 years from this guy and also adds the employer contributions. Do you find this realistic, doable, or actionable? And even if there's a 0.1% chance of this happening, what would the timeline be? Will he be able to spare time, money, and effort doing the follow-ups, etc.?
Then why at all suggest going to the EPF office and waste his time, which I am sure he can put to better use.
It's a different matter if this lecturer gathers all the staff to protest and takes things together.
Hope you get the point and no ill will meant.
@Pvragav2000—
I would agree with Nathrao. Just ask your friend to move on in career and life, but learn from this experience.
Regards,
TS