I completed my degree in 2007 and applied for convocation, but it got rejected. When I verified the certificates, there was a printing error in the 3rd-semester English subject. For a single subject, marks had been printed twice - 18 and below that 17. I checked with the college, and they confirmed that I had scored 58 marks. I applied for a marks card correction, but I received a marks card where they again printed the marks wrongly, giving me 28 instead of the correct 58 marks. Subsequently, I sent a lawyer's notice to Bangalore University, and they corrected it to 58 and sent the corrected marks card.
This entire process concluded in 2013. However, in the interim, I joined a bank in 2010 and submitted the same documents. Subsequently, I joined another bank in 2014. Both organizations conducted background verifications, and I explained the situation to them. They accepted my explanation. Now, as I plan to join another bank, I am unsure whether they will accept the discrepancies caused by Bangalore University's mistake. I now possess a convocation certificate indicating that I completed my degree in 2013 instead of 2007.
Kindly advise on how I should address this with the new HR. I have all the photocopies of the marks sheets displaying the printing errors.
This entire process concluded in 2013. However, in the interim, I joined a bank in 2010 and submitted the same documents. Subsequently, I joined another bank in 2014. Both organizations conducted background verifications, and I explained the situation to them. They accepted my explanation. Now, as I plan to join another bank, I am unsure whether they will accept the discrepancies caused by Bangalore University's mistake. I now possess a convocation certificate indicating that I completed my degree in 2013 instead of 2007.
Kindly advise on how I should address this with the new HR. I have all the photocopies of the marks sheets displaying the printing errors.