Understanding Stoppage of Increments: "Without Cumulative Effect" vs. "With Cumulative Effect"
My interpretation of the stoppage of increments for four years "without cumulative effect" and "with cumulative effect" is as follows:
In the former case, the employee will not receive any increments for four years. However, at the end of these four years, when the increment becomes due, the employee will receive all these increments (four increments that were on hold) together with the fifth-year increment at once. In this scenario, the employee does not suffer a significant financial loss.
In the latter case, the employee's basic salary is fixed at a lower stage and remains the same for four years. After this period, the employee will start earning increments from the fixed stage. For example, if the basic salary is reduced to 6050 (lowering it by two increments from 6450), then after four years, the employee will start receiving the first increment. The following year, the employee will return to the stage they were at before the punishment, i.e., 6450. This effectively results in losing six years of increments.
Eligibility for Promotion Test
Whether you are eligible to write the promotion test depends on the rules of the state. I presume this is a case of State or Central Service Rules and not a private establishment where such wider interpretations of law are not required. If there is nothing preventing an employee who has already been awarded a punishment from appearing for the promotion test, then you can also appear. Sometimes, the rules may prescribe a minimum period before which one cannot appear for such tests.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K