I have a different opinion. As you are aware, the HR department plays a vital role in getting such leave sanctioned. If not sanctioned, it constitutes leave without pay.
Importance of HR Control in Leave Sanctioning
To emphasize the seriousness of such leave and to have HR control, we need to have an example:
Case 1: An employee taking leave of a shorter duration for which a phone call would be sufficient. But how do we handle it if someone goes on leave for more than 5 days on short notice (without any prior intimation)?
Adhering to Traditional Leave Intimation Practices
Why not stick with the old formula of requiring intimation for a particular type of leave?
- PL: Intimation of 1 month in advance (varies from department to department, e.g., marketing, production, accounts).
- CL: Intimation on mobile.
- SL: Intimation on mobile but with medical proof.
Following such a procedure would instill seriousness in utilizing leave and maintain discipline in the organization. I have observed organizations where senior personnel frequently took PL (short leave) without proper intimation.
Encouraging Leave Utilization for a Healthy Work Environment
For a healthy environment, we make it compulsory for employees to exhaust CL & SL; otherwise, it would lapse. This would also provide monetary control over the HR fund.
Regards, Arjun Pandav