Contract Labor and Lay-Off Compensation: Is 240 Days Enough for Eligibility?

b_sujay2002
Any contract laborer who worked more than 240 days, is he eligible for lay-off compensation?

Regards,
Sujay
samvedan
As he is not an employee of the Principal Employer, the question of paying any layoff compensation by the Principal Employer does not arise. Having said that, kindly note the following points:

1) The Registration Certificate (for the PE) and the License (for the Contractor) must be in place, and the assumption here is that the establishment is covered by the Contract Labour (R&A) Act 1972.

2) The contract between the Principal Employer and the Contractor is not a sham.

3) The statutory compliances by the Contractor and/or PE are up to date with respect to all Contract Labour.

Next, despite the above position, many Principal Employers agree to reimburse the Contractor for such expenses if the need arises. Such reimbursements can include layoff compensation, retrenchment compensation, gratuity, and the bonus (though the applicable does not compel the PE to shoulder this burden) since the Service Charges payable to the Contractor do not cover such expenses anyway, hence the approach.

Regards,
Samvedan

January 16, 2015
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute