Dear Ritika and other members of the forum,
This is my 1801 contribution in this forum. In fact I wanted to thank you all in the eve of 2014 but regret to see counter responses / comments and appreciations to such counter responses / comments even after the answer is given by me with the help of provisions of Law giving it verbatim.
In my answer to the Queriest Ritika, I have not only given the provisions of Law but I asked her to be in the shoes of employee and questioned her whether she will accept the leave salary at basic only. Still there is a different view to my answer which is appreciated by Queriest Ritika.
I don't say that there should not be any different view. But the different view should have some supporting at least when previous response / answer is with the help of supporting.
This is my 1801 contribution in this forum. In fact I wanted to thank you all in the eve of 2014 but regret to see counter responses / comments and appreciations to such counter responses / comments even after the answer is given by me with the help of provisions of Law giving it verbatim.
In my answer to the Queriest Ritika, I have not only given the provisions of Law but I asked her to be in the shoes of employee and questioned her whether she will accept the leave salary at basic only. Still there is a different view to my answer which is appreciated by Queriest Ritika.
I don't say that there should not be any different view. But the different view should have some supporting at least when previous response / answer is with the help of supporting.