Is It Fair to Base Compensation on Designation and Travel Expenses on Role? Seeking Clarity

I am seeking clarification regarding the definition of eligibility criteria for compensation or travel expenses. I understand that eligibility for compensation/travel expenses is typically determined based on job designations, which are associated with specific bands/grades.

Question on Eligibility Criteria

My question is: Is it appropriate to base compensation eligibility on job designation while setting travel expense eligibility based on the role itself?

I would appreciate your prompt feedback on this matter.

Thank you.

The compensation and travel expenses readily differ based on designation. This is because of the dealings with the outside organization. A peon is responsible for submitting the documents to the other organization without any discussions. On the other hand, a manager is required to discuss the issues with the other party. Hence, it is justifiable for the organization to bear the expenses in such scenarios. All other factors aside, this approach is the best way to handle the outcome, focusing on the situation rather than the individual.

Best of luck...

I have enclosed herewith the TA rules of AICTE as guidance. Kindly make necessary amendments for your organization. This will help you to find the correct way of giving allowances for travel and stay. If you need further help, do not hesitate to reach out.

Best of luck.