Appointment Letter Confusion: Why Is Jurisdiction in Mumbai When HQ Is in Lucknow?

Appointment Letter Jurisdiction

The appointment letter states that the headquarters is in Lucknow, but for practical purposes and disputes, the jurisdiction is in Mumbai.

Regards

In the appointment letter issued by the headquarters in Lucknow, for all practical purposes and disputes, Mumbai jurisdiction has been indicated by the company without the consent of the employee. This was done solely to provide employment to the employee, but it appears as an attempt to deprive the employee of justice.

Labor Court's Observation on Territorial Jurisdiction

What is the labor court's observation on territorial jurisdiction? Is there a recent case that focuses on the cause of action or the specific point where disputes arise as the only basis for determining jurisdiction? Would a person who has been deprived of their salary have to travel to Mumbai to fight for the salary that is being unlawfully withheld?

Please let me know if you would like further clarification or have any other questions.

Certain compliance under various labour laws, more particularly ESIC/EPF, can be completed at places other than the posting location. However, concerning the payment of wages, minimum wages, industrial disputes, shops, commercial establishments, etc., the jurisdiction lies at the place of posting.

Regards,
P K Sharma